Curriculum Portal

neurologyYou need to know

• This area of study focuses on dialogue, meaning a two-way relationship in which Christian beliefs have influenced, and been influenced by, philosophy of religion and ethical theory.
• In the dialogue between Christianity and philosophy, the key Christian beliefs examined are beliefs about God, self, death and the afterlife, sources of wisdom and authority, religious experience, science and religion, the truth claims of other religions, and miracles.
• Philosophical discussion in this course tests Christian beliefs by asking whether they are reasonable, whether statements of faith are meaningful, whether beliefs are coherent within the wider belief system, and how far philosophical enquiry matters for faith.
• A belief is reasonable if it is supported by argument or is at least consistent with reason, even when it is not proved by empirical observation.
• A religious statement is meaningful if it communicates content that believers or critics can recognise, interpret, and evaluate, rather than being empty or purely emotive.
• A belief is coherent if it fits logically with other beliefs held within Christianity and does not create unresolved contradiction.
• The debate about faith as 'belief that' and faith as 'belief in' distinguishes faith as assent to truth claims from faith as trust, commitment, and relationship.
• Questions about God often connect Christian belief with philosophical arguments, challenges to divine attributes, and debates about whether belief in God is rational.
• Beliefs about self, death and the afterlife raise philosophical questions about personal identity, the possibility of life after death, and whether such claims are meaningful or coherent.
• Sources of wisdom and authority in Christianity, such as scripture, Church teaching, reason, and experience, shape how Christians defend beliefs and answer philosophical and ethical criticism.
• Claims about religious experience and miracles are central points of dialogue because they are used by some Christians as evidence for faith and challenged by others as subjective, improbable, or inconsistent with natural explanation.
• The relationship between scientific and religious discourses can be understood as conflict, independence, dialogue, or integration, and Christian responses vary across these models.
• The truth claims of other religions create a philosophical challenge for Christianity because exclusive, inclusive, and pluralist approaches make different claims about salvation and religious truth.
• In the dialogue between Christianity and ethics, Christian moral thinking is compared with deontological, teleological, consequentialist, and character-based approaches to moral decision-making.
• Kantian ethics is deontological because it judges actions by duty and universal moral law rather than by consequences, while Bentham’s utilitarianism is teleological and consequential because it judges actions by the outcomes of pleasure and pain.
• Virtue ethics is character based because it focuses on the moral agent’s virtues and formation of character rather than on rules alone or consequences alone.
• Christian ethics can be described in different ways because some teachings stress divine commands and duties, some stress human flourishing and the ends of life, some consider consequences such as harm and well-being, and some emphasise virtues such as love, justice, compassion, and faithfulness.
• Christian responses to issues such as human and animal life and death, theft, lying, marriage, same sex relationships, transgender matters, genetic engineering, wealth, tolerance, and freedom of religious expression are diverse because Christians interpret sources of authority and moral principles in different ways.
• Free will, moral responsibility, and conscience are important in Christian ethics because moral accountability usually depends on some degree of human freedom, and conscience is often treated as a guide in discerning right action.
• The impact of other ethical perspectives on Christianity can include support, challenge, partial compatibility, or deep disagreement, and these debates can affect how persuasive Christian moral teaching appears and how its sources of authority are judged.

• Analyse a Christian belief or ethical view by explaining how it has influenced, and been influenced by, philosophical or ethical ideas.
• Compare Christian moral reasoning with Kantian ethics, Bentham’s utilitarianism, and virtue ethics, identifying clearly whether the focus is duty, consequences, ends, or character.
• Evaluate whether a Christian claim is reasonable by using relevant arguments, counter-arguments, and clear criteria such as logical consistency and support from evidence or experience.
• Assess the meaningfulness of a statement of faith by explaining what the statement claims, who it is meaningful for, and why critics or believers may disagree.
• Judge the coherence of a Christian belief by linking it to other Christian doctrines and identifying whether the beliefs fit together without contradiction.
• Distinguish between faith as 'belief that' and faith as 'belief in', and apply the distinction accurately to a Christian example or argument.
• Construct a balanced argument about a contemporary ethical issue, using Christian moral principles, alternative ethical perspectives, and a justified conclusion.
• Interpret Christian responses to contested issues by referring to sources of authority such as scripture, Church teaching, reason, and conscience, and by recognising diversity within Christianity.
• Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Christian and non-Christian ethical perspectives on an issue, making direct comparison rather than describing each view separately.
• Plan and write an unstructured essay that selects relevant material, develops a line of argument, uses precise terminology, and reaches a supported judgement.